In other news, I have officially completed my class, Interviewing, after turning in an 18 page assignment. (Do you understand why these posts have sometimes been few and far between?) I have one paper left and I will be done with Feature Writing. Wooooooooooo. That was an enthusiastic wooooooooo for anyone wondering.
Now, this is completely off the topic of classes, but.... I legitimately just lost my train of thought while spying on my puppy. After looking around the table I'm sitting at, I have been unable to trigger whatever thought it was I was meaning to post. Oh well... we currently have free HBO so I guess that makes up for it?
I have a test in the morning. Pray your crazy little heads off... please.
Also, the plants are still growing... odd, I know. AAAAAnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd the frog thing still lives there. I watered the frog yesterday and he was not happy. I smiled.
Oh yes, now I remember what I meant to write in the aforementioned paragraph... and there was nothing on the table that could trigger this. Here it goes:
I am a supporter of children on leashes and harnesses. When people ask me what helped me develop that opinion, I say, "Look at Alyssa (www.alyinohio.blogspot.com). She turned out fine, for the most part." Also, I think if you have three children and you let them run around the parking lot at walmart, then you are irresponsible. Harness your children, bippity boppity!
I also hate when people put [insider] after an apparent inside joke on their facebook status. BTW, aren't all jokes inside jokes. Obviously, not everyone is going to know said joke, and isn't an inside joke just a joke shared between certain select people? Perhaps I will start a movement to ban that phrase. Also, sometimes I would like the "This is a taco-burrito conversation... nachos! (not yours)" saying to be banned. Not all the time, but definitely sometimes. Basically, when I am not using it, it should be illegal to use.
That is all. I think.
PS- I did really well with the spell check this week!